• Press
  • Offices
  • Contact
  • Legal notice
  • LinkedIn
  • EN
    • DE
  • UPC
  • Firm
    • Main Focus
    • History
    • Guiding Principle
    • Code of Conduct
    • Awards and Rankings
  • Our Team
  • News & Knowledge
    • News
    • Events
    • UPC-Update
    • IP-Update
    • EmpCo Directive
    • Publications
    • Subscription B&B Bulletin
  • Our Practice
    • Legal Areas
    • Industries
  • Career
  • Menu Menu
FIND EXPERTS
  • UPC
  • Firm
  • News & Knowledge
    • News
    • Events
    • UPC-Update
    • IP-Update
    • EmpCo Directive
    • Publications
    • B&B Bulletin
  • FIND EXPERTS
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Our Practice
  • Career
  • EN
    • DE
  • Legal Areas
  • Industries
Dr. Ute Kilger, Patent Attorney at BOEHMERT & BOEHMERT

transkript: Dr. Ute Kilger on clarity ob­jec­tions in Euro­pean patent grant pro­ceedings

6. July 2026/in Publications, Patents and Utility Models

Why excessive clarity requirements can undermine the value of patents

In issue 2/2026 of the life sciences magazine transkript, BOEHMERT & BOEHMERT Partner and Patent Attorney Dr. Ute Kilger examines a development that many patent applicants before the European Patent Office (EPO) are increasingly viewing with concern in her article “Clarity as a deadly wonder weapon”.

The article focuses on the question of how so-called clarity objections under Article 84 EPC are applied during examination proceedings. As a patent attorney specializing in pharmaceuticals and life sciences, Dr. Ute Kilger regularly advises companies and research institutions in European patent grant proceedings and is well acquainted with the practical challenges before the European Patent Office through many years of experience.

Using practical examples from the fields of diagnostics and antibody development, the article illustrates how extensive clarity requirements can affect the commercial value and future enforceability of patents. Excessive limitations on patent claims may result in patent rights losing their effectiveness against imitators and so-called fast followers.

Dr. Kilger therefore advocates a balanced and consistent application of clarity requirements in patent examination proceedings. At the same time, she encourages patent applicants to make active use of existing communication channels with the European Patent Office in order to raise awareness of problematic developments and foster constructive dialogue.

The full article, “Clarity as a deadly wonder weapon”, was published in the current issue of transkript and is available to subscribers in German.
https://www.boehmert.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Kilger-Ute-Portrait-Web.jpg 667 1000 Lucia Biehl /wp-content/uploads/2022/04/boehmert_logo.svg Lucia Biehl2026-07-06 10:34:412026-07-06 10:38:07transkript: Dr. Ute Kilger on clarity ob­jec­tions in Euro­pean patent grant pro­ceedings

Author

Dr. Ute Kilger

Contents

More articles

  • Dr. Julian Wernicke in GRUR Prax 13/2026 on the… 16. July 2026
  • Dr. Sebastian Engels and Dr. Julian Wer­nicke in the… 21. May 2026
  • Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt in GRUR-Prax 8/2026 on the… 4. May 2026

Menu

  • Firm
  • Our Practice
  • Career
  • News & Knowledge
  • LinkedIn
  • FIND EXPERTS

Informations

  • Press
  • Contact
  • Legal notice
  • Data Protection
  • General Terms and Conditions
  • Subscription B&B Bulletin
  • Contact

Legal Areas

  • Employee Inventions
  • Data Protection
  • Designs
  • Domains
  • Information Technology
  • Anti-Trust
  • Licensing
  • Trade Marks
  • Patent Valuation
  • Patents & Utility Models
  • Patent Litigation
  • Product Piracy
  • Copyright
  • Unfair Competition

© Copyright 2026– BOEHMERT & BOEHMERT

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top