• Press
  • Offices
  • Contact
  • Legal notice
  • LinkedIn
  • EN
    • DE
  • UPC
  • Firm
    • Main Focus
    • History
    • Guiding Principle
    • Code of Conduct
    • Awards and Rankings
  • Our Team
  • News & Knowledge
    • News
    • Events
    • UPC-Update
    • IP-Update
    • EmpCo Directive
    • Publications
    • Subscription B&B Bulletin
  • Our Practice
    • Legal Areas
    • Industries
  • Career
  • Menu Menu
FIND EXPERTS
  • UPC
  • Firm
  • News & Knowledge
    • News
    • Events
    • UPC-Update
    • IP-Update
    • EmpCo Directive
    • Publications
    • B&B Bulletin
  • FIND EXPERTS
  • Contact
  • Offices
  • Our Practice
  • Career
  • EN
    • DE
  • Legal Areas
  • Industries

The technical framework conditions of the ERVV concretise the standard for file formats that can be processed in court, but are not conclusive – Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt discusses a ruling by the Mannheim District Court in his latest GRUR-Prax article.

12. October 2020/in Publications, Unfair Competition

In issue 20/2020, Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt explains the decision of the Mannheim District Court (LG Mannheim), according to which the mere infringement of the legal requirements regarding file formats in electronic legal transactions with the courts does not mean that the document is deemed not to have been submitted, provided that the court can actually process the submitted format. The procedural document in DOCX format submitted in the dispute could be used as a representative document in PDF/A format due to the technical capabilities of the court. Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt describes that the litigant concerned was lucky in these proceedings, but that the decision cannot be generalised.

The magazine GRUR-Prax can be obtained from the publisher. Further details can be found here.

/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/boehmert_logo.svg 0 0 Petra Hettenkofer /wp-content/uploads/2022/04/boehmert_logo.svg Petra Hettenkofer2020-10-12 13:33:002022-07-25 08:38:07The technical framework conditions of the ERVV concretise the standard for file formats that can be processed in court, but are not conclusive – Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt discusses a ruling by the Mannheim District Court in his latest GRUR-Prax article.

Author

Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt, LL.M.

Contents

More articles

  • Dr. Julian Wernicke in GRUR Prax 13/2026 on the… 16. July 2026
  • transkript: Dr. Ute Kilger on clarity ob­jec­tions… 6. July 2026
  • Dr. Sebastian Engels and Dr. Julian Wer­nicke in the… 21. May 2026

Menu

  • Firm
  • Our Practice
  • Career
  • News & Knowledge
  • LinkedIn
  • FIND EXPERTS

Informations

  • Press
  • Contact
  • Legal notice
  • Data Protection
  • General Terms and Conditions
  • Subscription B&B Bulletin
  • Contact

Legal Areas

  • Employee Inventions
  • Data Protection
  • Designs
  • Domains
  • Information Technology
  • Anti-Trust
  • Licensing
  • Trade Marks
  • Patent Valuation
  • Patents & Utility Models
  • Patent Litigation
  • Product Piracy
  • Copyright
  • Unfair Competition

© Copyright 2026– BOEHMERT & BOEHMERT

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top