• Press
  • Offices
  • Contact
  • Legal notice
  • LinkedIn
  • EN
    • DE
  • UPC
  • Firm
    • Main Focus
    • History
    • Guiding Principle
    • Code of Conduct
    • Awards and Rankings
  • Our Practice
    • Legal Areas
    • Industries
  • Our Team
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • UPC-Update
    • IP-Update
    • Publications
  • Career
  • Menu Menu
FIND EXPERTS
  • UPC
  • Firm
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • UPC-Update
    • IP-Update
    • Publications
    • B&B Bulletin
  • FIND EXPERTS
  • Contact
  • Our Practice
  • Career
  • Offices
  • EN
    • DE
  • Legal Areas
  • Industries

The technical framework conditions of the ERVV concretise the standard for file formats that can be processed in court, but are not conclusive – Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt discusses a ruling by the Mannheim District Court in his latest GRUR-Prax article.

12. October 2020/in Publications, Unfair Competition

In issue 20/2020, Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt explains the decision of the Mannheim District Court (LG Mannheim), according to which the mere infringement of the legal requirements regarding file formats in electronic legal transactions with the courts does not mean that the document is deemed not to have been submitted, provided that the court can actually process the submitted format. The procedural document in DOCX format submitted in the dispute could be used as a representative document in PDF/A format due to the technical capabilities of the court. Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt describes that the litigant concerned was lucky in these proceedings, but that the decision cannot be generalised.

The magazine GRUR-Prax can be obtained from the publisher. Further details can be found here.

/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/boehmert_logo.svg 0 0 Petra Hettenkofer /wp-content/uploads/2022/04/boehmert_logo.svg Petra Hettenkofer2020-10-12 13:33:002022-07-25 08:38:07The technical framework conditions of the ERVV concretise the standard for file formats that can be processed in court, but are not conclusive – Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt discusses a ruling by the Mannheim District Court in his latest GRUR-Prax article.

Author

Dr. Rudolf Böckenholt, LL.M.

Contents

More articles

  • No likelihood of confusion with descriptive root… 20. January 2026
  • “Intellectual property rights have a significant… 16. December 2025
  • Patentability of AI generated inventions – article… 15. December 2025

Menu

  • Firm
  • Our Practice
  • Career
  • News & Events
  • FIND EXPERTS
  • LinkedIn

Informations

  • Press
  • Contact
  • Legal notice
  • Data Protection
  • General Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Legal Areas

  • Employee Inventions
  • Data Protection
  • Designs
  • Domains
  • Information Technology
  • Anti-Trust
  • Licensing
  • Trade Marks
  • Patent Valuation
  • Patents & Utility Models
  • Patent Litigation
  • Product Piracy
  • Copyright
  • Unfair Competition

© Copyright 2026– BOEHMERT & BOEHMERT

Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top